<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How can you tell whether your calculator follows the standard order of operations?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.calculator-tab.com/blog/2008/08/order-of-operations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.calculator-tab.com/blog/2008/08/order-of-operations/</link>
	<description>Free Online Scientific Calculator</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 07:03:58 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marek Kyncl</title>
		<link>http://www.calculator-tab.com/blog/2008/08/order-of-operations/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Marek Kyncl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 07:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calculator-tab.com/?p=40#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Hello cmbeke,

that the last zero(s) after a decimal point disappear(s), when you continue your calculation is not a mistake - it&#039;s intentional. It to tells you, that those zeros are not needed: 4.60 or 4.600 or 4.6000 are all exactly the same as 4.6.

For a future version of the calculator I am planning a feature which will let you set the number of decimal places under options.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello cmbeke,</p>
<p>that the last zero(s) after a decimal point disappear(s), when you continue your calculation is not a mistake &#8211; it&#8217;s intentional. It to tells you, that those zeros are not needed: 4.60 or 4.600 or 4.6000 are all exactly the same as 4.6.</p>
<p>For a future version of the calculator I am planning a feature which will let you set the number of decimal places under options.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cmbeke</title>
		<link>http://www.calculator-tab.com/blog/2008/08/order-of-operations/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>cmbeke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 02:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calculator-tab.com/?p=40#comment-45</guid>
		<description>hi, when i did 4.60*27 it took off the zero in 4.60 please fix it!
Thanks,
cmbeke</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi, when i did 4.60*27 it took off the zero in 4.60 please fix it!<br />
Thanks,<br />
cmbeke</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ernest D. Scheffey</title>
		<link>http://www.calculator-tab.com/blog/2008/08/order-of-operations/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Ernest D. Scheffey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 08:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calculator-tab.com/?p=40#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Thank you.
Well done - [****]^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you.<br />
Well done &#8211; [****]^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marek Kyncl</title>
		<link>http://www.calculator-tab.com/blog/2008/08/order-of-operations/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Marek Kyncl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 13:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calculator-tab.com/?p=40#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Hello Alison,

I&#039;m supposing you meant ( 0.00042 x 10^-17 )( 568,425 x 10^5 ), where the ^ sign means &quot;to the power of&quot;. If that is correct, then the solution would be 2.387385 x 10^-13, which I get on all the calculators that I have tried, including the one on this site. If I misinterpreted your problem then please let me know. If you use an email program and set the font to &quot;Courier&quot; or &quot;Courier New&quot; it might be easier for you to depict mathematical problems. My email address is marek [at] calculator-tab [dot] com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Alison,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m supposing you meant ( 0.00042 x 10^-17 )( 568,425 x 10^5 ), where the ^ sign means &#8220;to the power of&#8221;. If that is correct, then the solution would be 2.387385 x 10^-13, which I get on all the calculators that I have tried, including the one on this site. If I misinterpreted your problem then please let me know. If you use an email program and set the font to &#8220;Courier&#8221; or &#8220;Courier New&#8221; it might be easier for you to depict mathematical problems. My email address is marek [at] calculator-tab [dot] com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alison</title>
		<link>http://www.calculator-tab.com/blog/2008/08/order-of-operations/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Alison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 21:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calculator-tab.com/?p=40#comment-18</guid>
		<description>It does not work...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does not work&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alison</title>
		<link>http://www.calculator-tab.com/blog/2008/08/order-of-operations/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Alison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 21:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calculator-tab.com/?p=40#comment-17</guid>
		<description>sorry. the problem was supposed to be:
                    -17                        5
 ( 0.00042 x 10    )( 568,425 x 10   )

Sorry for all the trouble I&#039;m causing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry. the problem was supposed to be:<br />
                    -17                        5<br />
 ( 0.00042 x 10    )( 568,425 x 10   )</p>
<p>Sorry for all the trouble I&#8217;m causing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alison</title>
		<link>http://www.calculator-tab.com/blog/2008/08/order-of-operations/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Alison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 21:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calculator-tab.com/?p=40#comment-16</guid>
		<description>This is one of the problems I was having trouble with:

                    -17                       5
( 0.00042 x 10    )( 568,425 x 10   )


Things seemed to go wrong when I used a negative exponent.  Again, I might have been using the calculator incorrectly. Thanks for your help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of the problems I was having trouble with:</p>
<p>                    -17                       5<br />
( 0.00042 x 10    )( 568,425 x 10   )</p>
<p>Things seemed to go wrong when I used a negative exponent.  Again, I might have been using the calculator incorrectly. Thanks for your help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marek Kyncl</title>
		<link>http://www.calculator-tab.com/blog/2008/08/order-of-operations/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Marek Kyncl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calculator-tab.com/?p=40#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Hello Alison,

thanks for letting me know, that the calculator might not be working properly. I am not aware of a problem with the scientific notation or exponent function, but if you send me an example of an equation, where the calculator fails, I will look into it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Alison,</p>
<p>thanks for letting me know, that the calculator might not be working properly. I am not aware of a problem with the scientific notation or exponent function, but if you send me an example of an equation, where the calculator fails, I will look into it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alison</title>
		<link>http://www.calculator-tab.com/blog/2008/08/order-of-operations/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Alison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calculator-tab.com/?p=40#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Hello, I am taking Algebra 2 and I have been using this calculator and have always had positive results. However, today I am doing scientific notation and I could not seem to get the right answers although I was following the directions of my Algebra book and also the instructions on this site. It seems that the exponent key might not be working properly, because I found another calculator to use that gave me the right answers. I just wanted to let you know in case the exponent key is not working right. It could be that I wasn&#039;t using it correctly, but then again the other scientific calculator seemed to work. Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, I am taking Algebra 2 and I have been using this calculator and have always had positive results. However, today I am doing scientific notation and I could not seem to get the right answers although I was following the directions of my Algebra book and also the instructions on this site. It seems that the exponent key might not be working properly, because I found another calculator to use that gave me the right answers. I just wanted to let you know in case the exponent key is not working right. It could be that I wasn&#8217;t using it correctly, but then again the other scientific calculator seemed to work. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
